Tony Scotti’s Weblog

A Blog on Security Driving and Vehicle Dynamics

Surveillance Detection and Driving

Posted by tscotti on September 16, 2009

A while back, one of the oil companies asked me to do lessons learned from a vehicle ambush. It was a two car scenario with both cars taking some hits, but no injuries. The company wanted to know why these two drivers were able to drive out of this, these are there words not mine, with relative ease.

We went to the scene of the attack with the two drivers and asked them what they saw, when did they see it, and where were they when they saw it. My conclusion was that the driver of the principal’s car had a 1 to 1.5 second jump on the incident; basically he was 1.5 seconds ahead of the ambush.

My educated guess is that if these drivers had delayed there action by .5 to 1 second that these two guys would not be standing on a street corner talking to the big gringo. The question that needs to be answered is what gave them the “extra” time.

To answer that question you need to look at the science of reaction time. According to the scientists who have done an enormous amount of research on driver reaction time the “average” driver needs 2.5 seconds from the time they see the problem to the time they react to the problem. A Dr. Green has been researching reaction time for years, if interested in the science of reaction time Google his name. Here is a small part of what he found;

Condition A – When the driver knows they have to brake they can achieve the best possible reaction time. He says that the best estimate is 0.7 second. Of this, 0.5 is perception and 0.2 is movement, the time required to release the accelerator and to depress the brake pedal.

 Condition B – When the need to brake is a complete surprise reaction time is substantially different. In this case Dr. Green suggests that the best estimate is 1.5 seconds for something that may be coming at you from the side (This attack came from the side) and a few tenths of a second faster for straight-ahead obstacles.

What does all this science stuff have to do with Surveillance Detection?  A good SD program trains you to recognize pre incident indicators and to indentify danger zones. If through a good SD program you are in Condition A – you have an extra .5 to 1 second additional time to react to the problem. In the case of my two drivers according to my calculations it gave them an extra 26 to 52 feet, enough for them to drive out of the problem.

Corporation understand the higher the risk the more Driver Training and SD work together.  Corporations throughout the globe have recognized the need for SD, next year we will be in 4 countries conducting SD programs plus the programs that we do here in the US.  

TSVDI is conducting a Surveillance Detection Program  in New Jersey. It is the same program that we conducted for corporations throughout the world.

One Response to “Surveillance Detection and Driving”

  1. Hi Tony.
    Have a look at my link lower on this page..
    I´m CEO at Bodyguard And Limousine Service..
    We have all kind of limousines and bodyguards working all over Europe, including the only bulletproof streched limousine in Denmark, an 120″ white Lincoln limo..
    My chief of security have protected Paris Hilton, Run DMC, etc. – Politicians, been dorman in Las Vegas, and many other related jobs..
    I´m working freelance for the Danish Royal family, The Department of defence, foing department, United Nations and The Royal Danish army, – as a VIP Chauffeur.
    We will be happy to work with you any time!
    We are members of TransMedia Trading Company Inc., and we are working on an NLA membership..
    Sincerely,
    CEO
    Dean Lyngaard
    Bodyguard And Limousine Service

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>